Washington, USA — A high-level secret conversation, filled with military decisions and key figures from Donald Trump’s circle, may soon be made fully public, following new statements by The Atlantic‘s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, who revealed that his team is considering releasing the entire trove of messages from the controversial Signal group chat.
It all began with a shocking revelation: Goldberg claimed he was mistakenly added to an encrypted chat where military operations in Yemen were being discussed.
This exclusive channel, created by current National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, included top-ranking officials such as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
Also listed in the chat were a CIA representative, presidential adviser Stephen Miller, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.
During his appearance on the Bulwark Podcast with Tim Miller, Goldberg said they are carefully considering whether to release the full archive.
“My colleagues and I, along with those advising us, have some interesting conversations ahead about this,” he stated, emphasizing that just because others were reckless with sensitive material, he does not intend to act irresponsibly.
This potential mass publication of messages could once again shake the political landscape. The fact that a journalist was accidentally included in a communication channel discussing classified military action raises serious questions about the current administration’s security protocols and confidentiality standards.
As of today, public transparency faces a new ethical dilemma: how to balance the public’s right to know about critical decisions with the inherent risks of disclosing sensitive strategic communications.
So far, neither the White House nor the officials named have issued official statements. The Atlantic has not announced a date for a possible release of the messages, but anticipation is building as debate intensifies over the legal and political consequences of the material.